In order for people to think that hurting fish is unethical it is important for them to know that fish feel pain. A significant source of information for people is Google and their current snippet answer to "Do fish feel pain" is counterproductive to the aim of convincing people that fish do feel pain. Google Snippet for the question "Do fish feel pain?" (2018-12-12) How can we improve Google's snippet answer to the question do fish feel pain? Option 1) Create and popularize useful and authoritative content that answers the question "do fish feel pain" more effectively. While this can be difficult to do, the process of doing so is fairly simple, and is a much more robust and effective method for handling counterproductive search results. Option 2) Submit feedback to google. Under the snippet select "Feedback" Feedback to Google on the snippet answer to "Do fish feel pain" The feedback I submitted was You are an...
Let’s assume you think the world needs more lawyers helping animals. What are your options to make this happen? You can become a lawyer and help animals. You can go to go through the schooling and training required to become a lawyer. This will cost you ~8 years and ~$100,000 and at the end of the process you’ll have 1 lawyer with the potential to help animals with their new skills and degree. You can convince existing and upcoming lawyers to help animals Hand out 10,000 leaflets at the 4 closest law schools to you or at a law conference. This will cost you ~$1,000 and ~50 hours. At the end of the process you’ll probably have convinced ~100 people to go vegan, and ~2 will contribute to help animals. If your goal is to get more lawyers helping animals then it is most certainty quicker and cheaper to convince existing lawyers to help animals than it is to become one yourself. But what if you’re particularly well suited to be a lawyer? This is very possible...